The Danish Energy Agency (DEA) has launched tenders for three offshore wind areas that can house a minimum of 2.8 GW of installed capacity.
The process is based on a Contracts for Difference (CfD) model, which the DEA says will increase the likelihood of qualified bids, following the tender launched last year through which the state did not receive any bids for the first three of the six offered sites.
The sites are North Sea Central (Nordsøen Midt), Hesselø in the Kattegat and North Sea South (Nordsøen Syd). The deadline for bids for the North Sea Central and Hesselø is in the spring of 2026. The deadline for the North Sea South is autumn 2028.
The DEA is offering a two-sided capability-based Contract for Difference (CfD) for each of the three projects, following a dialogue with the industry.
Under the CfD model, the state guarantees the offshore wind power producers a fixed price for the electricity, which reduces the risk of low electricity prices for the developer and provides greater security. The Danish government has set a ceiling of a total of DKK 55.2 billion (around EUR 7.4 billion), including VAT. Mre like ths (offshorewind.biz) - link - are like this (wind) - link - more like this (Denmark) - link
The sites are North Sea Central (Nordsøen Midt), Hesselø in the Kattegat and North Sea South (Nordsøen Syd). The deadline for bids for the North Sea Central and Hesselø is in the spring of 2026. The deadline for the North Sea South is autumn 2028.
The DEA is offering a two-sided capability-based Contract for Difference (CfD) for each of the three projects, following a dialogue with the industry.
Under the CfD model, the state guarantees the offshore wind power producers a fixed price for the electricity, which reduces the risk of low electricity prices for the developer and provides greater security. The Danish government has set a ceiling of a total of DKK 55.2 billion (around EUR 7.4 billion), including VAT. Mre like ths (offshorewind.biz) - link - are like this (wind) - link - more like this (Denmark) - link

No comments:
Post a Comment